Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think this makes the FBI look dumb, but I don't think this really helps them either.

If the NSA did this for espionage it's one thing, but I'm curious as to whether substantially modifying the iPhone in this way would stand up in court.... How would the police assert that they preserved evidence after doing this?

I was involved in a drawn out case challenged the validity of data recovered from backup at great. That was easy to assert with normal IT people, and yet it took weeks to litigate. Couldn't imagine how this would go.



They're not looking to prosecute anyone (defendant is dead), presumably they're trying to recover info the could lead to more terrorists/plots


Yes, but presumably they might want to bring what they find as evidence in such future cases.


Heck, they can just use "parallel construction" and lie their teeth off, as usual.


The whole point is to build a precedent, remember?


You're talking a layer out. This is about what their rationale is.


As if they didn't have enough to convict even he the man wasn't already dead.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: