Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"but the fact that it takes years for the effect of reduced quality to become obvious: in the short term, consumer confidence in the brand is still high," The only thing I'd point out is that the two are related. Sears had this policy for a very long time and so it slowly becomes an established fact. That's why you can make the cost savings change and show new profits for a quarter, 2 quarters, maybe even a year or two. Most likely the "smart person" who made that decision gets promoted onto another group that needs better margins. Then the wheels come off but the exec is long gone onto something else.


I'm asuming there would be an entire board of directors or some such who were aware of this decision. They can't all be so naive that they dont realize the danger of undermining their brand reputation.

They must have made an informed decision.


sure, but what were their individual motives? If the CFO had a plan to migrate to SomeOtherCo(R) in two years if he did well enough at Sears, then maybe that was his horizon...


The board should have been informed, but I see no compelling reason to assume they were.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: