That has to be the wrong stock image included or something, bloody hell.

     magick image-l.webp image-r.jpg -compose difference -composite -auto-level -threshold 30% diff.png

It's practically all dark except for a few spots. It's the same image just different size compression whatever. I can't find it in any stock image search, though. Surely it could not have memorized the whole image at that fidelity. Maybe I just didn't search well enough.

Or the image was generated with AI in the first place and a test for Images 2.0

Haha! That would really take the cake. If it is, congratulations to them! I could never have known.

Well, it's on web archive. So unless they got their hands on it almost a month early or escaped their light cone it wasn't.

This is hilarious. Seems like kind of a random image for a model to memorize, but it could be.

There is definitely enough empirical validation that shows image models retain lots of original copies in their weights, despite how much AI boosters think otherwise. That said, it is often images that end up in the training set many times, and I would think it strange for this image to do that.

Regardless, great find.

I feel it's too much of a perfect match to be generated from the model's memory. It's pixel perfect. Gotta be a mistake.

Given the recency of that image, it is unlikely it is in the training data and therefore I would go with oversight.

The image is likely older than the article given this picture from over a year ago.

https://www.instagram.com/p/DGQ01bzTwyo/

That's not the same picture

I checked all the images on the blog post and I'm quite sure that the one you talk about isn't there.

They removed it. I have screenshots on my blog. bengarcia.dev/archives

Wow. How did you catch this??